Showing posts with label Schaefer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Schaefer. Show all posts

24 October 2014

U-bolt installation

September 2014


This was done two seasons ago and I don't think I ever posted pics.

At Cherubini we used to have heavy stainless-steel chainplates fabricated for the C44s. About five years ago a customer wanted these replaced and we sent out for a quote, getting a figure of about $125 for each one. There are ten rigging-attachment points on each side of a Cherubini 44.

In about 1980 Lee and I did some research, really just as an intellectual exercise, and discovered that common type-316 stainless-steel U-bolts, such as are used for transom tie-down points on trailerable boats, are both phenomenally strong and amazingly cheap. Therefore we concluded by revising the engineering specification for new C44 construction that we'd use Attwood 1/2" U-bolts for the main shrouds and 3/8" ones for the mizzens. These are rated at 16,000 and 12,000 lbs breaking load, respectively. So any four of them would serve as harness-attachment points to lift the whole boat. These were bolted through that massive solid-fiberglass flange, for which the C44 is famous (see Ferenc Mate's books) and reinforced with a 2" x 2" stainless-steel angle about six feet long. This has never, not once, ever failed in any C44 or C48, despite boats' having been subjected to incalcuable stresses due to storms and other conditions.

Meanwhile Hunter continued building boats with problematic through-deck chainplates bolted to plywood bulkheads that were treated with, if anything, polyester resin. Now how many of these boats' structures have failed?

I was resolved, from the start, to replace Diana's pokey little above-deck shroud-attachment angles with U-bolts.

Below is a pic from the cabintop comparing Diana's U-bolts (below) and the original factory 'chainplates' (above, on her sistership). The plate on Diana's deck is a G-10 bolster (riser) epoxied to the fiberglass to serve as a base plate for the stanchion base. The vintage Schaefer stanchion base will span the gap, having two bolts through the plate and two through the toerail (one of which replaces one of the existing toerail bolts). In this way water can travel past (under) it, rather than pooling on top of it and working its way (such as with the help of ice) into the boltholes. I am not too keen on having a stanchion located between chainplate-attachment points; but it's only for lifelines and we'll see how it turns out.





There is tape residue about Diana's toerail in this picture. Wherever there was aluminum corrosion, from under the SS plate, against the rail, I scraped away the softened material and coated it in black 5200. There's nothing else for it but to remove the entire toerail; and I'm not ready to go there (kind of like insisting on an unnecessary operation for a child who can very easily live comfortably with the malady's symptoms for many years yet). Note that these U-bolts are very close to the vertical face of the toerail. Attaching the shrouds will be problematic unless done by screwing the bottles onto the toggles already pinned to the U-bolts. But, again, we'll see. 

The first photo shows, from below, the starboard-side aluminum angle with the U-bolt bolted through it. All of these stainless-to-aluminum connections employ nylon flat washers and plenty of 5200. Note that the angle is turned with the vertical face inboard, not outboard against the hull. The locknuts are accessible from below and inside the aluminum angle. This piece of metal is about 1" wide and about 1-1/4" high. Keep in mind that its job is to enforce stiffness of the chainplate structure (against fatiguing flexing) as well as to serve as a backing plate (against tensile loads). Therefore the longer leg of the aluminum is vertical, not flat against the flange.



The big orange wire is my 115VAC system. When we had our Raider 33 (hull 5, about 1977) built, my dad paid a guy about $1200 to do the wiring (since he hated wiring) and the result was stiff, balky, marine-grade 12/3 triplex wire that was heavy and impossible to get to yield if it got in your way. My dad (typically curbing the compulsion to curse, to which anyone else would have given in) said, 'I'd been happier with an extension cord thrown through the window.' Recalling this, when it came time to wire Diana for 115VAC, I got a decent 14/3 extension cord from Lowe's and cut it into pieces for Diana's three sockets and battery charger. I mean, really-- it's only 15-amp service anyway. (In the yard, currently, I run everything-- except the heat gun and fan together-- on a similar wire. The power inlet is for 30 amps but the cord has a plug for 15-amp sockets on the dock.) 

The silver wire is the sending circuit for the depth finder. Note the 1974-vintage woven roving (trade name 'Fabmat') of the hull, even this high up. I'm embarrassed by this next pic because apparently I missed a spot when spraying in the adhesive for the hull liner.

This is Diana's port-side U-bolts angle, inside the linen cupboard in the head. Here is where I ran all the wiring-- the reds and yellows in this picture are all heading forward from the head for bow-rail bi-color light, (LED) floodlights in the forepeak, and one cabin light (an original one I rejuvenated) to be mounted on the bulkhead.

The white wire is for LED footlights along the bottoms of cabinetry and bunkfronts. That's three reds and a white. The black and heavier white one (VHF coax) are leading from the mast step towards the panel, aft.



The fourth red is for a secret: with the hull-mounted bow lights removed, Diana will be getting blue-LED 'eyes' in these openings, lending her personality-- but I'm not advertising that and it'll be something to be shown off at the commissioning party!




The Sweet Sister


The sistership, one of the trunk-cabin model I call 'series 2', beside Diana is destined to become as much a celebrity as Diana is (rather like Haylie Duff or Beth Ringwald). I have been calling her 'The Sweet Sister' as, though she is within two weeks of Diana's age, she has been terribly neglected and yet remains in better condition than Diana was when I acquired her and brought here. (For example, the deck and cabintop are all solid. She has not had the distress of having had POs screwing down hardware without proper preparation.)


The current owner has only recently acquiesced to my interest in gaining her title; and over the winter and spring I will be performing a basic restoration of her, topsides, interior, and rig, incorporating several Diana features but otherwise letting her remain stock, as a kind of comparison to my (highly-modified) boat. Of course the sister will be getting U-bolts, my mast step, a 115VAC system, stanchion-base bolsters and the same color scheme as Diana's.

Look for her at the planned Hunter Sail-In in Burlington NJ in early July-- she'll be up for sale (but only to a good home).


* * *

24 August 2012

Internal pole lift

Since this boat is so small, it's unlikely I'll ever have a proper whole-cockpit awning without setting it over the mainsail cover.  So when in the ICW or anywhere that calls for more powering than sailing, I won't have the opportunity to set any sail to assist the motor other than the jib itself, which is too far forward to allow the boat to balance under the one sail alone.  What's needed is a smaller sail more centrally set, fore-and-aft, that can pull reasonably well on most points of sail in light air... like an inner forestaysail.  And, more importantly, it will also serve to take over when/if the motor fails.

This is more important than most people realize.  A prudent mariner should never enter a dodgy or unfamiliar harbor with the mainsail cover drawn and snapped closed and the headsail bagged or lashed to the deck.  (I know-- most people will claim that having a roller-furling headsail resolves this.  But the point still bears consideration.)  In such a state, if you were to suffer an engine failure you'd be hard-pressed to get anything up and drawing air before you crashed or went aground.  It's a matter of simple seamanship.

I've had the idea to have a regular spinnaker-pole lift that can also be used as a halyard for a small jib, what I call the 'canal sail', something small but useful to assist the motor, provide safety and redundancy and maintain steerage in freaky currents and conditions.  I decided to use the former winch mount on the starboard side of the mast and to reuse the old Seaboard halyard winch for this.  (The port side gets another winch base and a Lewmar #6; more on this later).


This exit block came from DAMCO (Dwyer Aluminum Mast CO.)  These people are the very best in the business, helpful, sensible and economical.  This block cost $26.00 and handles 5/16" line (actually 3/8" would fit but oughtn't be loaded to capacity).  A Schaefer one is over $90.00.  I cut this hole and mounted this thing using tapped 10-24 screws; it will get removed when it comes time for paint and then reinstalled.

I calculated the location using an original 1973 blueprint of this boat's sail plan which Skip Moorhouse, sailmaker and first owner of Hunter 25 hull no. 1, let me inspect.  Assuming a theoretical inner forestay about 3'9" aft of the headstay, it would land on the foredeck about 4' aft of the headstay plate.  So the place for this block is about 9'7" down from the top of the mast.  In this way I could, if I chose to, fit a tang here to accommodate an inner forestay and running backstays and so configure this little boat as a bona-fide cutter.  I just figure if you're going to install something like this, you might as well make some sense of it, if only in theory.

At the other end I have to add an exit plate on the starboard side, rather high up in order ti lead it down to the winch.  The existing two exit plates are for the two main halyards.

In reusing the old Seaboard winch I have to keep in mind that the handle for it is a hexagonal drive, unlike modern standard square-drive winches.  Apparently in the early days of top-action winches (about 1968-1978), there was no standard top-drive handle format (sounds eerily familiar to the development patterns of other technology!).  Fortunately I have one of these handles; though it might have been easy enough to just use the Seaboard winch as a snubbing winch and use arm strength to cleat it tightly each time-- it's only a pole lift on a 10-ft pole.  But now I have to ensure that I have room on the spar for two handle holders, one for each handle.

* * *